ArticleInsight

UK Equities: Regrouped and Reformed, now Ready to Rally?

Amid the doom and gloom associated with UK equities, it’s easy to miss the capital markets reform that’s bubbling under the surface. We’ll admit, this isn’t sexy stuff – and in a period dominated by Trump politics and AI disruption, it hardly makes headlines. But its significance for UK equities, and UK small caps in particular, should not be underestimated.

The current state of play

Sustained under-allocation to domestic equities in the UK has generated a negative spiral of weak productivity and economic growth. As accounting rules and regulation have driven UK institutional investors to derisk over the past 25 years, the positive feedback loop of investing in UK companies to bolster the real economy – through employment, innovation, wealth creation and tax revenues – has been largely forgotten.

Lacklustre growth and technical headwinds have contributed to the UK underperforming global equity markets. Assessing the opportunity today, we don’t need to persuade you that UK equities are cheap. Instead, the question on everyone’s lips is: “What is the catalyst for the valuation gap to close?”

(Part of) the solution

To quote Warren Buffet, “To the extent we have been successful, it is because we concentrated on identifying one-foot hurdles that we could step over, rather than because we acquired any ability to clear seven-footers.”[1]

Below we detail six recent changes. Each in isolation might not move the needle. Taken in combination, however, they should meaningfully improve supply and demand within UK public markets.

 

The changes




Supply side changes

1. Simplification of the Listing Rules

Combining the Premium and Standard segments of the London Stock Exchange (LSE) into a unified main market in July 2024 has removed unnecessary complexity and brought the UK in line with international standards. Crucially, amendments to the eligibility criteria – such as removing the need for a three-year financial track record and introducing greater flexibility regarding dual-class share structures – now make it easier for early-stage, high-growth and founder-led businesses to list in the UK.

Changes to the UK Prospectus Regulation Rules are also in progress. These should make it easier for companies to raise additional capital once listed (including capital from retail investors) and reduce the ongoing cost of being a public company – a burden that is particularly onerous for smaller companies. The proposal for protected forward-looking statements[2] marks a significant shift in attitude, resetting the balance between opportunity and risk.

Why is this important? Where a company chooses to list drives the ecosystem around it, which ultimately produces tax revenues. In 2023, the UK financial services sector generated 12% of the UK’s total tax receipts[3], providing a key source of funding for our public services (equivalent to more than half of the NHS’s annual budget).

We are all acutely aware of the current hole in the UK government’s finances. Deterring homegrown companies from listing on the LSE is a part of the problem. If Arm had listed in London, rather than on Nasdaq, its c$100bn post-IPO increase in market capitalisation[4] could have generated billions in capital gains tax revenues[5], reducing the requirement for UK tax rises.

 

2. The Mansion House Compact

The UK has a great start-up ecosystem and track record of successfully scaling companies. However, later stages of UK companies’ growth are often financed by international investors[6] and many eventually decide to redomicile elsewhere.

 

Underfunding of later-stage growth leads to fewer IPOs




The Mansion House Compact seeks to address this. It’s a commitment from 11 of the largest defined contribution pension funds to allocate 5% of their default schemes to private companies by 2030 – to help growing UK companies go global and build the pipeline for future IPOs. With an average market cap of c£560m[7], IPOs are typically in the sweet spot for investment in UK smaller companies funds.

This industry-led initiative is just one element of the Capital Markets Industry Taskforce's multi-pronged approach to improving the efficacy of the UK public and private markets. Its stated aim is to make UK capital markets the place for great companies to “start, grow, scale and stay[8]”.

 

3. Simplification of corporate governance requirements

The UK Corporate Governance Code is seen as the global standard, and is one of the key reasons to list on and invest in the UK market. But guidance has become too cumbersome, especially for smaller companies.

In January 2024, the Financial Reporting Council simplified its approach. The ‘Comply or Explain’ principle aims to strike a better balance between maintaining high standards and the competitiveness of the audited company. By removing unnecessary cost and regulatory hurdles, we expect this to make UK public markets a more attractive place for companies of all sizes.

In addition, the implementation of a new cost-disclosure framework for investment trusts shows the government’s appetite for improving the competitiveness of listed securities.

 
Demand side changes

1. Pension reform

UK pension funds represent the third-largest pool of institutional capital globally[9]. But the UK is an outlier among OECD countries for how little it invests in its domestic equity market[10]. The double whammy of defined benefit schemes derisking (favouring bonds over equities) and moving to global benchmarks (favouring global over domestic stocks in their remaining allocation) has been a significant headwind to UK equity markets for a prolonged period.  




Public sector pension consolidation, the Mansion House Compact and the recent of the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) should facilitate institutional investment in UK companies over their long-term investment horizons. It is a starting point for rebalancing UK pension funds’ risk tolerance in line with their global counterparts. The Labour government has stated its willingness to intervene if these measures do not drive a sufficient improvement in pension funds’ domestic bias[11].

Changes to “Value for Money” rules – to focus on net returns, instead of solely on cost – should also support capital flows into parts of the market where active management adds value. In 2023, there was only one local government pension scheme with an allocation to UK smaller companies[12].

 

2. Greater retail participation

The rise of the ‘Magnificent Seven’, capital flows into passive investments and comparatively lacklustre UK GDP growth have driven retail investors to invest a greater proportion of their assets globally.

Portfolio diversification is, of course, rational, but the current UK tax structure creates no incentive to invest domestically: investors have total flexibility in

their investment options within their pensions and ISAs, with their respective income and capital gains tax reliefs; stamp duty is payable only on UK shares so actually incentivises investment overseas; and the UK is the only country in the world to give a tax incentive for cash saving!

Labour is committed to simplifying the ISA regime to encourage investment[13]. There have been a number of changes proposed by the industry, such as merging cash ISAs and stocks and shares ISAs[14]. Greater retail participation disproportionately benefits smaller companies[15]. We only need some of the £350 billion currently sitting in cash ISAs to be reallocated to equities to make a big difference.

 

3. Investment research review

The unbundling rules for research payments, introduced under MIFID II in 2018, have disproportionately impacted sell-side research coverage of UK smaller companies. Consolidation of UK research providers has resulted in poor breadth and depth of coverage for smaller market capitalisation stocks[16]. As of August 2024, however, the FCA has reversed these restrictions, making it easier for companies to procure research and, importantly, widening access to it.

For more on all of the issues covered above, we recommend an excellent podcast by Charles Hall at Peel Hunt, Dame Julia Hoggett and Charlie Walker of the LSE[17] and CMIT’s Capital Markets of Tomorrow report for further reading.

 
Clear political appetite to reinvigorate the UK’s capital markets

“Growth is the number one mission of this government,” says Minister for Pensions Emma Reynolds. “If growth is the challenge, then investment is the solution.”

Although there have been a few false starts this year – hopes of a British ISA and of minimum allocations for pension funds in UK equities are yet to come to fruition – there is a clear ambition to address any systemic barriers to the competitiveness of UK capital markets.

Reform remains high on the political agenda, evidenced by LSE CEO Dame Julia Hoggett, who summed up City Minister Tulip Siddiq’s intentions as: “All the things that you as an ecosystem liked that the previous government was doing, we are going to finish. All the things you liked that you didn’t think they were doing fast enough, we are going to go faster. All the things you liked that you didn’t think they were going to do, we are going to do[18].”

The siloed nature of the UK’s regulatory landscape requires concerted effort from numerous stakeholders to affect change. Although we don’t expect one thing to be the sole catalyst for UK equity outperformance, recent wins are significant and momentum appears to be building. Outflows are stabilising and higher volumes of risk capital should have an important waterfall effect, driving demand for and improving liquidity in UK small and micro caps. As with all market turning points, it may not appear obvious at the time, but it is incredibly clear in hindsight.

[1] https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1989.html

[2] The revised liability treatment for protected forward-looking statements lowers the risk for issuers when communicating their financial prospects to investors, particularly at IPO. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/call-for-input/protected-forward-looking-statements-engagement-paper-3.pdf

[3] https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/supporting-businesses/economic-research/research-publications/total-tax-contribution-of-uk-financial-services#:~:text=Nationally%2C%20the%20financial%20and%20professional,than%20half%20the%20health%20budget.

[4] $66bn on 11th November 2023 and $170bn on 14th October 2024, source: Bloomberg

[5] LSE estimate it could have offset the c£6bn shortfall for which the proposed fuel duty increase was earmarked https://peelhunt-insights.gallery.video/241115

[6] https://institute.global/insights/economic-prosperity/capital-issues-reforming-the-uks-capital-markets-to-boost-science-and-tech

[7] Average market cap of London main market IPOs at time of listing between 2018 and 2023 was $711m https://www.lsegissuerservices.com/spark/5qZithecCzkisuDQA1K1bm/small-cap-companies-find-a-more-supportive-home-in-london-vs-new-york

[8] https://capitalmarketsindustrytaskforce.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Capital-Markets-Of-Tomorrow-report.pdf

[9] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6736181254652d03d5161199/Pensions_Investment_Review_interim_report.pdf

[10] UK pensions have a lower than average allocation to domestic equities as a percentage of their assets and total equity allocation, and relative to the size of the local stock market https://www.newfinancial.org/reports/comparing-the-asset-allocation-of-global-pension-systems

[11] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6736181254652d03d5161199/Pensions_Investment_Review_interim_report.pdf

[12] New Financial

[13] https://www.investmentweek.co.uk/news/4381280/isa-reform-review-absence-budget-mansion-house#:~:text=But%20back%20in%20January%202024,of%20Stocks%20and%20Shares%20ISAs%22.

[14] https://www.ajbell.co.uk/group/news/eight-reasons-british-isa-bad-idea

[15] Retail investors account for 25% of the shareholder register for small and mid-cap companies on AIM https://www.sharesoc.org/investor-academy/advanced-topics/uk-stock-market-statistics/

[16] 79% of public companies with a sub-£250m market cap have either no research coverage or are covered by only one analyst https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/consultation/cp21-9.pdf

[17] https://peelhunt-insights.gallery.video/241115

[18] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6736181254652d03d5161199/Pensions_Investment_Review_interim_report.pdf

 

KEY RISKS

The value of investments and any income generated may go down as well as up in response to general market conditions and the performance of the assets held, and is not guaranteed. An investor may not get back the amount originally invested.

Past performance is not a reliable guide to future results.

Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of investments.

There is no guarantee that the Fund will meet its stated objectives.

The movements of exchange rates may lead to further changes in the value of investments and the income from them.

There is a risk that any company providing services such as safe keeping of assets or acting as counterparty to derivatives may become insolvent, which may cause losses to the Fund.

 

For professional investors only.

Capital at risk.

 

For more information about the fund and how the fund is positioned, please visit our fund centre below:

RGI UK Listed Smaller Companies fund

View Fund

For professional investors only.

This document has been prepared by River Global Investors LLP (“RGI”). RGI is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority (Firm Reference No. 453087) and is registered in England (Company No. OC317647), with its registered office at 30 Coleman Street, London EC2R 5AL. The value of investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. An investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future results. Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of investments. This article does not constitute an investment recommendation and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Opinions, estimates and projections in this article constitute the current judgement of the author as of the date of this article. Please note that individual securities named in this article may be held by the Portfolio Manager or persons closely associated with them and/or other members of the Investment Team personally for their own accounts. The interests of clients are protected by operation of a conflicts of interest policy and associated systems and controls which prevent personal dealing in situations which would lead to any detriment to a client.