ArticleInsight

The False Economy of Lower Fees

When I started my career with a wealth manager over 40 years ago, clients were charged 1.65% for the first part of a trade, with lower rates depending on the size of the order. Not so long ago, institutional fees were around 40-50bp, whereas today they are typically somewhere between 4 - 6bp: virtually nothing. When I managed a smaller company fund, I would often pay well above bid-ask spreads to either acquire shares that were in scarce supply or conversely sell at prices well below, when I felt fundamentals were deteriorating and I wanted to exit.

The cost of dealing, commission or spread always ended up as being insignificant compared to the impact of the investment decision.

Last year, according to the London Stock Exchange, investors withdrew £15.13bn from active UK strategies[1]. In April 2003 UK investors held around 66% of their assets in equity funds. Today it is less than 50%[2]. Alternative assets have no doubt taken some share, but the biggest impact has been the use of ETFs. These funds have, rightly, displaced many active funds that charged high fees for a portfolio very similar to that of the index. With annual costs of around 20 basis points for the most popular global equity ETFs, they have provided low cost and strong performance.

However, financial products are often undone by their own popularity, and they rarely provide a free lunch forever. The largest indices that passive funds follow are now heavily skewed towards a few countries, companies and sectors.

The US now dominates. The MSCI World Index, which should maybe be renamed, has over 74% exposure to the US, with the top 10 holdings being US companies, including all of the Magnificent 7. This is way beyond the US’s share of global GDP which is closer to a third.[3]

While share prices should follow earnings, not GDP, corporate valuations must still be anchored to something real for them to make sense. Accordingly, the US appears over-represented in this index and does not provide the diversification that some investors might expect.




These products may also have implications for investors seeking regular cash returns. U.S. companies are well-known to prefer buybacks to those in other regions, and the dividend yield on the S&P 500 is now barely above 1%[4]. Not only do buybacks increase the risk of market timing, but the lack of dividends hints at another potential unpleasant surprise – earnings per share can be far removed from cash per share.  

Indices can also contain companies with a different problem – paying out too much cash. This is especially the case in high yielding sectors that often take on too much leverage and end up cutting their dividends. It might cost slightly more to ensure that an income-focused portfolio is prudently spread out, and with healthy growing dividends, but that is a price I consider well worth paying.

The most dangerous periods in financial markets are often preceded by a common condition: everyone crowded in the same room, and someone shouts fire. Lower expenses are in everyone’s interests, as are more choice and competition. But not if it comes at the cost of patience, due diligence and common sense. There are important and perhaps unintended consequences when investing in index ETFs. If they result in the wrong decision at the wrong times, they will almost always outweigh any minimal savings in annual fees.

 

[1] Source: LSE

[2] Source: LSEG Lipper

[3] Source: MSCI

[4] Source: Bloomberg

KEY RISKS

The value of investments and any income generated may go down as well as up in response to general market conditions and the performance of the assets held, and is not guaranteed. An investor may not get back the amount originally invested.

Past performance is not a reliable guide to future results.

Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of investments.

There is no guarantee that the Fund will meet its stated objectives.

There is a risk that any company providing services such as safe keeping of assets or acting as counterparty to derivatives may become insolvent, which may cause losses to the Fund.

 

For professional investors only.

Capital at risk.

 

For more information about the fund and how the fund is positioned, please visit our fund centre below:

RGI Global Income and Growth Fund

The focus of the fund is to invest in leading global businesses offering lower risk and modest share valuations. We conduct proprietary research focusing on businesses’ long-term earnings potential, including ‘worst-case’ scenario modelling. The outcome is a differentiated, conviction portfolio with a high active share.

Visit Fund

For professional investors only.

This document has been prepared by River Global Investors LLP (“RGI”). RGI is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority (Firm Reference No. 453087) and is registered in England (Company No. OC317647), with its registered office at 30 Coleman Street, London EC2R 5AL. The value of investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. An investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future results. Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of investments. This article does not constitute an investment recommendation and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Opinions, estimates and projections in this article constitute the current judgement of the author as of the date of this article. Please note that individual securities named in this article may be held by the Portfolio Manager or persons closely associated with them and/or other members of the Investment Team personally for their own accounts. The interests of clients are protected by operation of a conflicts of interest policy and associated systems and controls which prevent personal dealing in situations which would lead to any detriment to a client.